IFRS - Pros And Cons For Investors Samples †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the IFRS - Pros And Cons For Investors. Answer: Introduction: The report is prepared for demonstrating the advantages and disadvantages of International financial reporting standards (IFRS) to investors. International financial reporting standards are the standards that are issued by independent organization based in United Kingdom that is International accounting standards boards. It was ascertained that the uniform accounting standard had substantial ignorance of making it mandatory. Agreement about the implementation of important commercial transactions is the fundamental economic functioning of the accounting standards. The integral component between firms and its stakeholders such as lenders, shareholders, suppliers, customers and managers are method used for accounting (Grabinskia et al. 2014). Efforts are made by such organization in narrowing down the gap between accounting standard of different countries and IFRS. Countries under this concept are not required to make the recognition of IFRS standards and can comply their reporting with the standards of respective countries. The discussion of pros and cons of such international standard is done by making reference to the given article international financial reporting standards (IFRS); pros and cons for investors, Accounting and Business Research, International Accounting Policy Forum, pp. 5-27. Discussion: World is witnessing increased integration of politics and markets and that is what making the integration of adoption of accounting standards inevitable. The contracts efficiency between firms and their lender have become more transparent with the implementation of IFRS. The working on convergence project of IFRS comes with the likelihood of addition of this particular standard by almost all countries over the world. There are varieties of potential direct advantages attributable to investors resulting from the widespread international adoption of IFRS (Hagen 2016). Therefore, the advantages that are derived by equity investors from the international standard can be divided into direct and indirect advantages. Comprehensive, accurate and timely information about the financial statements of different reporting entities will be provided to investors using the IFRS platform. Many of the adjustments made in the financials of company would be eliminated with the adoption and this will facilitate comparison between entities and help in providing relevant information to investors. Investors risks pertaining to adverse selection of stock and being les informed will also be eliminated with the help of such international standard (Gallego et al. 2016). Furthermore, IFRS also promises increased transparency and accordingly increasing efficiency between investors and firms. Equity investors will be at advantageous state in terms of reduced cost of capital along with increasing debt market contract efficiency. The ability of investors to make informed financ ial decisions is triggered by the adoption of such standard as it will contribute towards elimination of confusion arising from financial measures used in different countries and using different ways for measuring financial status of reporting entities. Among various investors, the standard will help in creating a fairness and establishment of code of conduct. There will be greater scope for investor to make international investments and the financial resources will be effectively allocated worldwide. Moreover, there will be increased attraction of foreign and institutional investors for making investment in different countries and accordingly this will lead to diversification of the risks by widening their portfolio of stocks (Nastase et al. 2016). It is seen that as the world of business comes closer with the help of globalisation with the help of their trade and financial ties, there are several countries that are moving towards International Financial Standards and the general r ules of accounting that addresses how the transactions need to be reported and what is the kind of information that should be revealed in the financial reports. This unitary set of the standards has rectified the several issues while generating others. The organizations that utilise similar standards in order to construct their financial reports can be compared with one and another in a more accurate manner. This is especially significant when undertaking a comparison among the organizations that are situated in various countries as they may in certain cases may be making use of various methodologies and rules to construct their financial reports. This rise in the level of comparability has assisted the investors to effectively ascertain whether the dollar that has been invested should go. There has been an observation that implementation of IFRS by a nation can have an impact on smaller and the larger companies. Conversely, the small businesses have a greater impact as they do not have significant amount of resources at their disposal to incorporate any transformations and even train their employees. This leads to the smaller organizations appointing accountants either internally or externally in order to assist the changes that have taken place. These small organizations will bear further financial stress than the larger organizations. IFRS makes use of principle based philosophy rather than the rule based one. The principle based philosophy explains that the aim of each of the standard is to reach at a significant valuation and that there are several ways to reach there. This provides the organizations the independence to incorporate IFRS to their specific scenario which leads to more simplified and effective financial reports. Therefore, investors would also be beneficial in terms of their efficient management of their portfolio. Improvement in professional practice of reporting entity to report their financials would help in development of stock market of fewer developing countries. Identified issues as presented in the article: From the analysis of the given article, it can be seen that the crucial issue about the standard implementation is related to the method of fair value accounting as it creates ambiguity as well as irrelevance to investors about financial position of entities. Main issue about the International accounting standard is fair value accounting as it comes with wide range of problems. In practical life, liquidity of market is considered as an important issue. Noise can be created in the financial statements presented in the annual report of reporting entities resulting from creation of substantial uncertainty of fair value due to large spreads. Moreover, the fair value estimates can be manipulated by managers in an illiquid market by making an influence on quoted as well as traded prices of shares of entities. During major financial crisis, the standard has failed to test the fair value accounting concept and making lenders discover fair value as fair weather value (Persons 2014). Fair valu e accounting provides information to investors by incorporating that is more accurate and timely about losses and gains on derivatives, securities and other transactions mentioned in the financial statements. Under the IFRS, earnings of companies will be more informative and hence in contradiction there will be more volatility and difficulties in forecasting. Many reporting entities does not make the estimation of actual arms length market price and report the estimated market price when there is unavailability of liquid market price (Jones 2015). In such situation, there arises an imperfect pricing model by the introduction of model noise and consequently imperfect estimation of several parameters of models. Fair value accounting drift in IFRS is the factor that will accentuate the extent of adoption and that are dependent upon judgement of managers and auditors. In many countries, the implementation of concepts of fair value accounting in the IFRS is associated with encountering of several problems such as widespread, illiquidity and involvement of subjectivity in making estimates in mark to model. The countries that will be weak in enforcement of such standard are the ones that have poor information about the reasons behind impairment of assets and have greater room for exercising judgement about fair value. The opportunities for manipulation by managers increase when the stimulation of market price is done by the accounting method of mark to model. This is so because the estimates of parameters and choice of models is determined by managers. However, considerable faith has been placed in the concept of fair value accounting rules of IFRS and accordingly there is an effort on the development of conceptual framework in joint association with IASB and FASB. It is depicted from the article provided that there is uneven enforcement of IFRS around different countries of world due to overwhelming economic and political reasons. International standard cannot be regarded as international standards because of inevitability considerable international differences in quality and practice of financial reporting. One of the concerns that have arisen is misleading of investors in believing about the uniformity in practice due to widespread adoption of IFRS (Scott 2015). In actual practice, there will n ot be such uniformity observed with the implementation of the standard and it will remain hidden under the seemingly factor of uniformly adoption of standard. Furthermore, the ability of uniform standard adoption to reduce the risk and cost associated with the information is curtailed by such uneven implementation. In addition to this, transnational investors could experience increased cost of information processing due to uneven standard implementation (Lukka and Pihlanto 2014). This is so because the accounting inconsistencies and transparency level will be buried at deeper level due to difference in standard across countries. The article throws light on the fact that the issue regarding the implementation of IFRS standard is far away from public sight and has not received substantial attention. Adoption decision of IFRS at the national level is most visibly impacted by political and economic decisions (Mayer 2016). One of the vital implications in this particular area of research on the IFRS implementation is that the endogenous functions of political, local and economic institutions is the factor that is responsible for contributing to differences in international reporting standards. The actual reporting behaviours of companies will not be changed in material fashion due to importing of exogenously industrial set of accounting standards (Nastase et al. 2016). IASB does not have any implementation mechanisms for making countries adapt to IFRS and they cannot enforce the requirement of practicing such standard. Article also focuses on some long-term concerns is using the brand name of IFRS in an unfettered way. Implementation of IFRS is perceived as signal of quality for the companies adapting to such reporting standards. Implication and adoption of IFRS has not been clarified in the presence of local and political problems having considerable influence on reporting practice. The adoption of IFRS to lower quality countries need to incur lower costs due to factors such as wholesale adoption of the standard and regimes of lower quality that has the likelihood of incurring fewer political and economic costs (Level and Schndube 2014). It is essential for such countries to adopt the brand name of the standard due to emergence of classic free rider problems. Incorporation of fair value accounting in the IFRS is another concern is relation to reporting system in countries that are less developed (Nurunnabi 2016). Adoption of IFRS by companies is a political and economic experiment and there is yet to be clarified on the various pros and cons to investors with the implementation of such standard. Conclusion: This report has therefore looked to explain the pros and the cons of the investors that are in accordance to the International Financial Reporting Standards. The report has looked to recognise the issues that have been presented in the concerned article. The implementation of IFRS in several nations is dependent on the social, economic and political factors and the variations in these standards are due to these factors too. The incorporation of IFRS acts as a signal of quality for the companies and thereby makes the financial reports of the companies much more effective. The report has therefore looked to generate a critical thinking and a technical research on the pros and cons for the investors in accordance to the implementation of International financial reporting standards. It is known that market liquidity is a significant issue and therefore any kind of discrepancy that is observed in the financial reports of the companies generally due to the uncertainty in the fair value. Th e key factor for such issues has been manipulations that have been made by the management and therefore this is one of the cons for the investors. The incorporation of the standards can be helpful in mitigating these issues and thereby a much fair and true statement can be constructed with the help of which the investors can be benefitted. The report has therefore explained the article explicitly. References: Baxter, W.T., 2014. Accounting theory (Vol. 3). Routledge. Gallego- lvarez, I., Cuadrado-Ballesteros, B. and Meja-Rosario, N., 2016. IFRS implementation at international level: a biplot analysis. International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation, 12(4), pp.422-444. Grabinskia, K., Kedziora, M. and Krasodomska, J., 2014. The Polish accounting system and IFRS implementation process in the view of empirical research. Accounting and Management Information Systems, 13(2), p.281. Hagen, W., 2016. Accounting quality as mediating factor between the adoption of IFRS and cost of equity capital. Hudson, J., 2014. Agency and IFRS Implementation: The Relationship between Primary Participants. Studies in business and accounting, (8), pp.61-79. IO?A, A., Avram, M. and Mihai, M., 2015.Empirical Study Related To Increasing The Accounting Information Quality At The Import-Export Companies Through Ifrs Implementation Annals of the University of Craiova, Economic Sciences Series, 1. Jones, S. ed., 2015. The Routledge companion to financial accounting theory. Routledge. Level, E.M.M. and Schndube-Pirchegger, B., 2014. Accounting theory. Lukka, K. and Pihlanto, P., 2014. The developer of Finnish accounting theory. Twentieth Century Accounting Thinkers (RLE Accounting), 34, p.60. Mayer, L.M., 2016. The New Lease Accounting Standard: The Effects of IFRS 16 (Doctoral dissertation, Universitt Konstanz). Mora, A. and Walker, M., 2015. The implications of research on accounting conservatism for accounting standard setting. Accounting and Business Research, 45(5), pp.620-650. Nastase, G., Calin, A.M. and Margina, O., 2016. INTERNATIONAL ACCOUNTING STANDARD NO. 16 TANGIBLE ASSETS AND ITS PRACTICAL IMPLEMENTATION. Calitatea, 17(S1), p.285. Nurunnabi, M., 2016. The Role of the State and Accounting Transparency: IFRS Implementation in Developing Countries. Routledge. Persons, O., 2014. A principles-based approach to teaching International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 13, p.1. Scott, W.R., 2015. Financial accounting theory (Vol. 2, No. 0, p. 0). Prentice Hall. Sharma, S., Joshi, M. and Kansal, M., 2017. IFRS adoption challenges in developing economies: an Indian perspective. Managerial Auditing Journal, 32(4/5), pp.406-426.